IPL Song | IPL 6 Schedule/Results | Points Table | Live Match in Progress Eliminator: Rajasthan v Hyderabad: Preview - Commentary - Scorecard
Reports

Title Filter     Display # 
Id Article Title Author Reads
151 AUS v SL, 2nd ODI, Match Report

2nd ODI: Australia v Sri Lanka (Winner: SL)

SL 213/3 (U Tharanga 86*, T Dilshan 47, K Sangakkara 45, S Watson 2/34) beat AUS 210 (S Watson 40, C White 35, T Perera 2/39, N Kulasekara 4/48) by 29 runs (D/L method).

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: U Tharanga Sydney Cricket Ground (5 Nov,2010)
cow-analysis

Sri Lanka got off to a great start with Tharanga and Dilshan laying a solid platform before two quick wickets left them at 116/2 after 24 with COW of 48%. Tharanga then continued in Sangakarra’s company and lead Sri Lanka to a position to launch a final assault when rain interruption meant that Sri Lanka ended with 213/3 in 41.1 overs with COW of 48%. However D/L method revised Australia’s target to 240 from 39 overs. Australia lost Haddin early and then Ponting too before Watson and Clarke took them to 71/2 before two quick wickets left them at 80/4 after 16 overs with a COW of 42%. No batsman converted his start in to a match winning knock as Australia ended at 210 all out to hand Sri Lanka their first ever series win in Australia.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Sri Lanka)- 41.1 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 10 Overs: SL 49/0 SL 50% Sri Lanka's start was very solid,
      as they started with a good opening partnership. Sri Lanka’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SL 98/1 AUS 51% Sri Lanka’s opening partnership
      continued in the same vein but the wicket gave Australia a slight upper hand. Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 30 Overs: SL 142/2 AUS 54% Sri Lanka lost another wicket while
      the pace of scoring was not particularly quick. Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 41.1 Overs: SL 213/3 AUS 52% Sri Lanka picked up the pace,
      improving their chances in a rain affected encounter that cut their innings short. Sri Lanka’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Australia: Target 240)- 38 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 9 Overs: AUS 35/2 SL 55% Facing a stiff target of 240 runs
      from 38 overs, Australia got off to a really poor start losing 2 wickets, while the required rate zoomed to over 7. Australia’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 18 Overs: AUS 89/4 SL 59% Australia’s situation worsened during
      this period as they lost 2 more wickets while the required rate kept creeping up. Australia’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 27 Overs : AUS 135/5 SL 68% Australia’s situation was looking
      very bleak as it was left to the last recognised pair to get Australia home. Australia’s chances decreased by 9% during this period.
arrow 37.4 Overs : AUS 210/10 SL 100% Australia went down swinging as
      Sri Lanka won their first series against Australia. Sri Lanka won by 30 runs.


The Stats Team 531
152 AUS v SL, 1st ODI, Match Report

1st ODI: Australia v Sri Lanka (Winner: SL)

AUS 239/8 (M Hussey 71*, B Haddin 49, T Perera 5/46, L Malinga 1/39) lost to SL 243/9 (A Mathews 77*, L Malinga 56, X Doherty 4/46, M Jhonson 1/68) by 1 wicket with 34 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: A Mathews Melbourne Cricket Ground (3 Nov,2010)
cow-analysis

After the lopsided T20 people expected Australia to come back strongly. Batting first, Aussies lost Watson early but Clarke and Haddin batted sensibly to take them to 79/1 after 16 with COW of 49% before 3 quick wickets had them tottering at 88-4 with COW of 44%. Hussey and Marsh stage a mini recovery but despite Hussey’s fighting fifty, he got little support and Australia reached 239/8 in 50 with COW of 47%. This should have been a cakewalk for Sri Lanka and for sometime it did seem so. After two early wickets Mahela and Sangakarra were cruising along before Mahela fell leaving with score at 76. 3 more wickets fell as Lanka collapsed to 87/6 after 19 with COW of 37%. Mathews are Randiv brought some sanity back but a double strike left Lanka in deep trouble at 111/8 after 26 with COW of 19%. While everyone was busy writing them off Mathews first helped Malinga settle and then they took Powerplay to blast themselves closer to the finishing line and what happened next was an unbelievable partnership as they both recorded fifties to get within sniffing distance. There was more drama as Malinga was run out but they managed to sneak home to win by 1 wicket.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Australia)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 13 Overs: AUS 64/1 SL 51% Australia started well enough but
      they lost the early wicket of Shane Watson. Australia’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: AUS 108/4 SL 57% Australia succumbed to Sri Lanka’s
      python-like bowling that applied the choke on the Australian Innings. Australia’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: AUS 160/5 SL 55% The rescue operation was left to
      Mike Hussey once again, who performed admirably bringing Australia to a decent position. Australia’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: AUS 239/8 SL 53% A few lusty blows here and there
      brought Australia to a total that could be fairly described as middling. Australia’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Sri Lanka: Target 240)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 14 Overs: SL 68/2 SL 50% Despite the Fact that Sri Lanka lost 2
      wickets early, Crisp strokeplay from Sangakkara, put Sri Lanka back on track .Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 26 Overs: SL 111/8 AUS 81% The Sri Lankan batting order just
      imploded, as a major collapse left the Sri Lankans looking at an early finish and an embarrassing defeat .Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 31% during this period.
arrow 44.3 Overs : SL 243/9 SL 100% In one of the most spectacular
      tailend comebacks in the history of ODI’s, Angelo Matthews and Lasith Malinga both scored half-centuries on the way to a record 9th wicket partnership, with Murali scoring the winning runs. Sri Lanka won by 1 wicket.


The Stats Team 561
153 SA v PAK, 3rd ODI, Match Report

3rd ODI: South Africa v Pakistan (Winner: SA)

SA 228/9 (H Amla 119*, JP Duminy 26, S Akhtar 3/39, S Afridi 2/53) beat PAK 226/9 (F Alam 59*, I Farhat 47, M Morkel 4/47, L Tsotsobe 1/28) by 2 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: H Amla Dubai International Cricket Stadium (2 Nov,2010)
cow-analysis

After the miracle witnessed in last match there were no favourites. South Africa, with Kallis back in the side, batted first. Shoaib removed Kallis and Ingram early to leave them at 16/2 after 5 with COW down to 47%. AB stuck around unconvincingly with Amla before Duminy gave him some support. Amla was the only one to pay heed to Coach as he notched up yet another century but wickets fell regularly to leave them at 228/9 with COW of 46%. Likewise Pakistan was reeling at 13/2 after 7 with COW of 45% before Farhan and Asad took them to 93/2 after 27 with COW of36%. Then wickets kept falling while Fawad held up one end as they stumbled to 195/7 after 46 with COW of 34%. Wahab Riaz connected few swings and suddenly match was on even keel but South Africa managed to squeeze through by 2 runs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 13 Overs: SA 43/2 PAK 55% South Africa found the going
      tough on a slow pitch, losing 2 wickets early, while run-scoring was increasingly difficult . South Africa’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: SA 107/3 PAK 54% South Africa started to pick
      the gaps, getting a few singles in the process. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: SA 149/5 PAK 60% South Africa lost wickets at
      inopportune moments decreasing their chances of getting a good total. South Africa’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 228/9 PAK 54% South Africa total was not ideal,
      but disciplined bowling and and the slow pitch should help their cause . South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Pakistan: Target 229)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 12 Overs: PAK 26/2 SA 59% Pakistan got off on the wrong foot,
      going along at barely 2 an over, batting like the pitch was minefield and losing 2 wickets to boot. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 13% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: PAK 84/2 SA 64% The 3rd wicket partnership put some
      stability in the innings but did not greatly improve the run-rate. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs : PAK 139/5 SA 71% Pakistan was in the same situation,
      as they were in the 2nd ODI, but the situation was still improble. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: PAK 226/9 SA 100% South Africa choked horribly,
      but in the end, it was difficult to decide who choked more, South Africa for allowing Pakistan to get close, or Pakistan for not winning from a winnable position. South Africa won by 2 runs.


The Stats Team 584
154 AUS v SL, Only T20I, Match Report

Only T20I: Australia v Sri Lanka (Winner: SL)

AUS 133/8 (B Haddin 35, S Smith 34, S Randiv 3/25, T Perera 2/22) lost to SL 135/3 (K Sangakkara 44*, T Dilshan 41, M Jayawardene 24, P Siddle 1/34) by 7 wickets with 21 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Randiv Western Australia Cricket Association Ground, Perth (31 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

When Australia chose to bat first, we all expected a high scoring encounter. But that was not to be. On a hard, fast and bouncy pitch the Lankan seamers made instant mark and by the end of 7 overs they were 31/3 with a COW down from 51% to 45%. Haddin and Smith staged recovery with a 6th wicket partnership to take them 103/5 after 17 with COW of 45% before late flourish saw them reach 133 with COW of 43%. Sri Lanka got off to a great start before 2 quick wickets had them at 45/2 after 5 with COW of 59%. Dilshan and Sangakarra put the result beyond doubt as they took them to 112/2 in 14 overs with COW of 75% before Perera’s cameo took them home in 16.3 overs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Australia)-20 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 5 Overs: AUS 22/2 SL 52% Australia started poorly, losing 2
      early wickets, along with a poor run-rate. Australia’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: AUS 43/4 SL 58% Australia lost more wickets putting
      them in a really poor position. Australia’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: AUS 85/5 SL 57% A rear guard effort by Smith and Haddin
      gave some impetus to the Australian innings. Australia’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: AUS 133/8 SL 57% Australia got a smallish total that
      Sri Lanka would back themselves to chase but Australia would still have a decent chance. Australia’s chances did not change during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Sri Lanka: Target 134)-20 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 4 Overs: SL 37/1 SL 60% Dilshan and Jayawardene started
      the innings with a bang, chipping away at the target. Sri Lanka’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 8 Overs: SL 64/2 SL 60% Despite losing 2 wickets, Sri Lanka
      was still well on time to reach the target. Sri Lanka’s chances remained during this period.
arrow 12 Overs : SL 90/3 SL 63% Despite slowing down , Sri Lanka
      was still on course towards the target. Sri Lanka’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 16.3 Overs: SL 135/3 SL 100% Sri Lanka sped off towards the
      target, finishing the match with quite some time to spare. Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets.


The Stats Team 641
155 SA v PAK, 2nd ODI, Match Report

2nd ODI: South Africa v Pakistan (Winner: PAK)

SA 286/8 (C Ingram 100, H Amla 65, W Riaz 2/43, S Afridi 2/59) lost to PAK 289/9 (A Razzaq 109*, S Afridi 49, F Alam 48, C Langeveldt 3/75) by 1 wicket with 1 ball remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: A Razzaq Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi (31 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

South Africa were the clear favorites even without Smith and Kallis. Batting first, they lost Petersen early but Amla and Ingram steadied the innings. Amla continued to play like a dream while Ingram was uncharacteristically circumspect as they took South Africa to 100/1 in 20 overs with COW of 51% before Amla fell. AB helped Ingram take the further before he fell to Afridi. Duminy and Ingram flourished together as has become a norm lately and some lusty hitting at the end saw SA reach 286/8 with a COW of 57%. With most batsmen answering Coach’s call he would be reasonably happy. Pakistan’s tryst with disastrous starts continued. And with the top 4 batsmen unable to get going they were 72/3 after 19 with a COW of just 27%. Afridi came in and played as if this was a featherbed and fell just short of a fifty and out walked Razzak. Razzak and strangely subdued Alam took Pakistan to 211/5 in 41 overs with COW of 25%. All looked lost when Alam also fell, but Razzak blasted 7 fours and 10 sixes, while wickets kept tumbling at the other end, to score and unforgettable century and take Pakistan to victory by 1 wicket with just one ball to spare.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 12 Overs: SA 68/1 SA 53% While Opening Robin Petersen
      was not the best of decisions, Amla and Ingram ensured the South Africa still had a decent start. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: SA 127/2 SA 52% South Africa consolidated milking
      the singles, but it kept the run-rate down. South Africa’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: SA 197/3 SA 53% Ingram helped South Africa
      reach a great base for the final overs, for which they could reach a good total. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 286/8 SA 57% Although South Africa, lost a bit
      of momentum in the batting powerplay, Duminy hit a few blows to help South Africa to a great total. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Pakistan: Target 289)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 10 Overs: SA 55/0 SA 69% Despite a hand injury to Graeme Smith,
      South Africa powered away towards the small target. South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SA 105/1 SA 75% Amla and Kallis were grinding away
      the Pakistan bowling in a clinically efficient manner. South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 30 Overs : SA 156/2 SA 86% The result was by now a formality,
      as Pakistan’s only hope was the weather getting the batsmen back to the pavilion .South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 39.3 Overs: SA 207/2 SA 100% South Africa won comfortably in the end,
      mostly due to the fact that they eschewed the wild shots that the Pakistani batsmen played. South Africa won by 8 wickets.


The Stats Team 593
156 SA v PAK, 1st ODI, Match Report

1st ODI: South Africa v Pakistan (Winner: SA)

PAK 203 (M Hafeez 68, Y Khan 54, L Tsotsobe 4/27, J Botha 2/40) lost to SA 207/2 (J Kallis 66, AB de Villiers 51, H Amla 35, S Ajmal 2/42) by 8 wickets with 63 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: L Tsotsobe Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi (29 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

South Africans were slight favourites to win the match based on recent form of both the teams. Pakistan opted to bat first. In the face of some tight bowling South Africa, Pakistan struggled to score initially and lost Asad as they crawled to 26/1 in 8 overs with a COW of 44%. Old-horse Younis Khan joined Hafeez at crease and they took Pakistan to 140/1 after 30 with a COW of 49%. However once Hafeez fell, Pakistan collapsed like 9 pins as none of the batsmen answered Coach’s call. 9 wickets fell for 63 runs as Pakistan were bowled out for 203 with COW of 37%. South Africa got off to a brisk start but a Shoaib special forced Smith off the field. Amla continued in rich vein of form and in the company of Kallis and when he fell, SA were on their way with 75 runs in 13 overs with COW of 30%. AB joined JK and they both scored fifties before one retired and other got out. Ingram and Duminy followed Coach’s advice as South Africa cantered home in less than 40 overs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Pakistan)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 13 Overs: PAK 49/1 SA 55% Pakistan did not take the initiative
      during the first few overs, getting fewer runs than they would have liked. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: PAK 113/1 SA 52% A solid Partnership between Hafeez
      and Younis held the Pakistan innings together. Pakistan’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: PAK 165/3 SA 54% Pakistan lost 2 quick wickets after
      a good partnership but they still had the platform for a good total. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 49 Overs: PAK 203/10 SA 63% Pakistan imploded with a rash of poor
      shots and meek dismissals, leaving the bowlers very little to defend. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 9% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 204)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 10 Overs: SA 55/0 SA 69% Despite a hand injury to Graeme Smith,
      South Africa powered away towards the small target. South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SA 105/1 SA 75% Amla and Kallis were grinding away
      the Pakistan bowling in a clinically efficient manner. South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 30 Overs : SA 156/2 SA 86% The result was by now a formality,
      as Pakistan’s only hope was the weather getting the batsmen back to the pavilion .South Africa’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 39.3 Overs: SA 207/2 SA 100% South Africa won comfortably in the end,
      mostly due to the fact that they eschewed the wild shots that the Pakistani batsmen played. South Africa won by 8 wickets.


The Stats Team 1235
157 SA v PAK, 2nd T20I, Match Report

2nd T20I: South Africa v Pakistan (Winner: SA)

PAK 120/9 (Misbah-ul-Haq 33, A Razzaq 25, J Theron 4/27, L Tsotsobe 2/20) lost to SA 125/4 (G Smith 38, C Ingram 31, S Afridi 1/13, M Hafeez 1/19) by 6 wickets with 8 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: J Theron Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi (27 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Pakistan had a disastrous start once again and reduced to 41/5 in 8 overs with a COW of 40%. Mishbah then put together partnership with Razzak and then with Haider to take Pakistan to 120/9 with a COW of 33%. Just like in previous match, Misbah started off very slowly and by the time he accelerated it was too late but he did prevent them from collapsing for a small total. South Africa got a off to a decent start with Akhtar and Gul bowling a tight spell. Once Bosman was out, Smith and AB made slow but steady progress till both fell in quick succession to leave them at 72/3 after 14 overs with a COW of 54%. But Duminy and Ingram blitzed through the Pakistan bowling to end the match in 18.4 overs and win the series 2-0.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Pakistan)-20 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 5 Overs: PAK 29/2 SA 53% Pakistan lost 2 quick wickets
      with a low run-rate. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: PAK 52/5 SA 61% Pakistan’s top order collapsed due
      to a combination of good bowling, good fielding, stupidity and more stupidity. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 8% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: PAK 84/6 SA 66% Pakistan’s position continued to go
      south as they failed to provide a good base for the death. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: PAK 120/9 SA 67% Pakistan ended up notching an
      extra run above their previous day’s performance, not much of an improvement. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 121)-20 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 5 Overs: SA 34/0 SA 69% Smith and Bosman started well
      enough giving Pakistan a good start. South Africa’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: SA 57/1 SA 69% South Africa had wickets in hand
      even though their run-rate had dipped a bit. South Africa’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 14 Overs : SA 72/3 SA 54% A combination of economical and
      penetrative bowling gave Pakistan more than a foothold during this period. South Africa’s chances increased by 5% during this period.
arrow 18.3 Overs: SA 125/4 SA 100% Like the previous day Pakistan gave
      away the match by virtue of a poor over which finished the match for them. South Africa won by 6 wickets.


The Stats Team 605
158 SA v PAK, 1st T20I, Match Report

1st T20I: South Africa v Pakistan (Winner: SA)

PAK 119 (Misbah-ul-Haq 27*, S Afridi 25, L Tsotsobe 3/16, J Botha 3/31) lost to SA 120/4 (C Ingram 46*, JP Duminy 41,S Akhtar 2/29, S Ajmal 1/18) by 6 wickets with 10 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: JP Duminy Sheikh Zayed Stadium, Abu Dhabi (26 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Pakistan got off to a decent start and then followed it with small partnerships but no one steadied the ship as they stumbled to 53/3 at the end of 8 with a COW of 45%. Afridi played a cameo of 25 off 7 to life the spirits a little but a circumspect knock by Misbah coupled with zero support at other end saw them falter to 119 all out with a COW of just 32%. South Africa didn’t start too well and were soon reduced to 29/3 after 6 with a COW down to 57%. But Duminy and Ingram put together 66 runs before late flourish from Ingram and Miller finished the game off with 10 balls to spare.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Pakistan)-20 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 5 Overs: PAK 38/1 SA 52% Pakistan stated fairly quickly although
      they did lose an early wicket. Pakistan’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: PAK 77/3 SA 53% Pakistan continued to maintain
      a decent rate but they lost 2 more wickets. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 14 Overs: PAK 91/6 SA 59% Pakistan’s position deteriorated
      losing their top order quickly. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 19.5 Overs: PAK 119/10 SA 68% With few wickets left Pakistan could
      not make use of the Death overs, ending up with a mediocre total. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 9% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 120)-20 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 5 Overs: SA 26/2 SA 62% South Africa started poorly giving
      Pakistan a toehold on the game. South Africa’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 9 Overs: SA 46/3 SA 55% South Africa were still behind
      the rate improving Pakistan’s chances. South Africa’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 14 Overs : SA 83/3 SA 60% South Africa sped along with the
      Duminy- Ingram partnership making the scenario more comfortable for South Africa . South Africa’s chances increased by 5% during this period.
arrow 18.2 Overs: SA 120/4 SA 100% The 18th over which gave away 17
      runs made the situation a cakewalk for South Africa, making the result a formality. South Africa won by 6 wickets.


The Stats Team 529
159 SA v ZIM, 3rd ODI, Match Report

3rd ODI: South Africa v Zimbabwe (Winner: SA)

SA 399/6 (JP Duminy 129, AB de Villiers 109, S Masakadza 2/95, P Utseya 1/58) beat ZIM 127 (T Taibu 28, J Theron 3/18, W Parnell 2/30, J Botha 2/32) by 272 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: JP Duminy Willowmoore Park, Benoni (22 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

After two big victories, South Africa were the firm favorites for their 3rd ODI against Zimbabwe. SA got off to an electric start and were over fifty before Smith fell. Another quick wicket meant that they were 59/2 in 7 but their COW was already at 57%. The double century stand between Duminy and AB took them to 276/2 in 38 overs with a COW of 70% before late hitting propelled them to 399 runs with COW of 80%. Chasing 400 is never easy, but it got worse as Zimbabwe were 32/3 after 7 with COW down to just 15%. Taibu and Ervine tried to stabilize the innings but the task was too much and they eventually folded up for 127 in 29 overs to lose the series 3-0.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 13 Overs: SA 86/2 SA 56% South Africa started with a bang,
      although they lost the openers, they continued to hammer the bowling. South Africa’s chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: SA 163/2 SA 60% The de Villiers and Duminy combo
      continued to wallop the bowling in a way that was looking monotonous . South Africa’s chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: SA 261/2 SA 68% The boot-filling continued as
      both de Villiers and Duminy reached their centuries. South Africa’s chances increased by 8% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 399/6 SA 80% The runs kept flowing , with the
      bowling attack being hammered, falling a run short of 400. South Africa’s chances increased by 12% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Zimbabwe: Target 400)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 15 Overs: ZIM 77/3 SA 90% Zimbabwe tried to maintain their
      dignity in the faces of this huge target, unfortunately losing 3 wickets while the required rate crossed 9. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 10% during this period.
arrow 29 Overs: ZIM 127/10 SA 100% Zimbabwe crumbled like the
      Zimbabwean economy on a bad day . South Africa won by 272 runs and won the series 3-0


The Stats Team 649
160 IND v AUS, 2nd ODI, Match Report

2nd ODI: India v Australia (Winner: IND)

AUS 289/3 (M Clarke 111*, C White 89*, M Hussey 69, A Nehra 2/57) lost to IND 292/5 (V Kohli 118, S Raina 71*, Y Singh 58, C McKay 3/55) by 5 wickets with 7 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: V Kohli Dr. Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy Cricket Stadium, Visakhapatnam (20 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Australia got off to a disastrous start with two early wickets lost and struggled to score as they laboured to 57/2 in 17 overs as their COW fell to 40%. Hussey and Clarke set about reviving the inning with a century partnership and by the time Hussey got out Australia were 160/2 in 37 with a COW of 43%. Oz took advantage of powerplay and Clarke’s century plus White’s whirlwind fifty took them to 289/3 with a COW of 56%. Indian inning mirrored Australia’s with two early wickets and a slow start that saw them reach 51/2 in 13 with COW of 36%. But Yuvraj and Virat put together a century partnership before Yuvraj fell after scoring a fifty with India at 172/3 in 34 overs with a COW of 33%. Raina and Virat then raised the tempo and even though Virat and Dhoni fell quickly, Raina’s quickfire fifty ensured India won with 7 balls remaining.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Australia)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 12 Overs: AUS 35/2 IND 58% Australia’s start was
      uncharacteristically slow although credit must be given to to some disciplined Indian bowling. Australia’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 24 Overs: AUS 91/2 IND 61% Australia found the going
      tough as the run-rate was below 4. Australia’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: AUS 160/3 IND 57% Hussey helped loosen the
      shackles and Clarke was settled by this point. Australia’s chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: AUS 289/3 AUS 56% Cameron White played a masterstroke
      of an innings as Australia clobbered India to reach a humongous 289. Australia’s chances increased by 13% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (India: Target 290)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 12 Overs: IND 49/2 AUS 63% Shikhar Dhawan had a nightmare
      debut getting a duck as India could not quite capitalise on the powerplay. India’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: IND 117/2 AUS 69% Kohli and Yuvraj steadied the
      ship but the required rate was pushing upwards . India’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: IND 192/3 AUS 63% Kohli upped the ante as the
      required rate was mangeable. India’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
arrow 48.5 Overs: IND 292/5 IND 100% Kohli and Raina and let on, Tiwary,
      ensured that India crossed the finish line, without hiccups. India won by 5 wickets.


The Stats Team 776
161 SA v ZIM, 2nd ODI, Match Report

2nd ODI: South Africa v Zimbabwe (Winner: SA)

ZIM 268 (T Taibu 78, B Taylor 32, J Theron 5/44, C Langeveldt 2/49) lost to SA 273 (H Amla 110, AB de Villiers 101*, G Smith 40, S Masakadza 1/63) by 8 wickets with 66 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: J Theron Senwes Park, Potchefstroom (17 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Zimbabwe got off to a decent start before 3 quick wickets, including that of last match’s hero Taylor, left them at 60/3 in 13 with COW of 45%. Taibu set about recovery in partnership with old horses Grant Flower and Ervine but both couldn’t convert their starts in to big scores. Once Taibu fell it took some late hitting by Dabengwa and Utseya to take them to 268 all out with a COW of 44%. South Africa were off the blocks quick in pursuit and by the time Smith was out they reached 84/1 in 13 with a COW of 60%. At this point AB joined Amla and they both went about the chase as If the target was 350+. Amla departed after yet another century but by then they were 224/2 in 34 with COW of 69%. AB continued his onslaught as he hit 5 sixes, the last one bringing up his century and finishing the match in 39 overs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Zimbabwe)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 12 Overs: ZIM 60/2 SA 54% Zimbabwe could not quite get a
      great start, losing 2 quick wickets. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 24 Overs: ZIM 119/4 SA 59% Zimbabwe’s travails continued as
      they lost 2 more wickets with an OK run-rate. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 36 Overs: ZIM 178/5 SA 63% Zimbabwe could not quite help their
      cause as they pottered along at 5 an over. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 48.2 Overs: ZIM 268/10 SA 56% Zimbabwe managed a decent total,
      getting bowled out but still something that the bowlers can fight with. Zimbabwe’s chances increased by 7% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 269)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 10 Overs: SA 69/0 SA 64% South Africa started in a hurry,
      while the Zimbabwean bowlers were pasted again. South Africa’s chances increased by 8% during this period.
arrow 19 Overs: SA 123/1 SA 60% South Africa slowed down while
      being on track, Amla looking good once again. South Africa’s chances decreased by 4% during this period
arrow 29 Overs: SA 192/1 SA 70% Amla powered to yet another century,
      while South Africa powered to victory. South Africa’s chances increased by 10% during this period.
arrow 39 Overs: SA 273/2 SA 100% De Villiers scored another century as
      South Africa reached the target with 11 overs to spare. South Africa won by 8 wickets.


The Stats Team 2037
162 NZ v BAN, 5th ODI, Match Report

5th ODI: New Zealand v Bangladesh (Winner: BAN)

BAN 174 (S Hasan 36, I Kayes 34, D Vettori 3/32, K Mills 3/36) beat NZ 171 (G Elliot 59, D Vettori 43, R Hossain 4/25, A Razzak 2/34) by 3 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: R Hossain Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur (17 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

3-0 down in the series we expected the Kiwis to come out all guns blazing to win this one and save their face. And for a while it did look like that. They knocked off 4 Bangladeshi wickets to leave them at 79/4 in 17 overs with COW of 42%. But Shakib yet again waged a fight back in company of Mushfiqur and it looked like déjà-vu all over before Shakib fell in 29th over as Bangladesh were 133/5 with COW of 43%. After that it was just a formality as Mills and Mckay wrapped up for 174 in 45th over with COW of 31%. New Zealand couldn’t have asked for a worse start as Rubel reduced them to 20/5 in 7 overs with a COW down to 50%. But Vettori was determined to fight and along with Elliot he took Kiwis back to a commanding position at 106/5 in 30 with COW still at 50%. However Vettori and N. McCullum fell in quick succession before Mills and Elliot took them to the verge of victory. But Rubel came back to finish what he had started as Kiwis fell short by 3 runs to give Bangladesh a 4-0 series win.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Bangladesh)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 11 Overs: BAN 57/2 BAN 46% Bangladesh started at a decent clip
      but 2 wickets kept their chances low. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 22 Overs: BAN 100/4 BAN 42% Bangladesh lost 2 more wickets,
      while their run-rate dropped. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 33 Overs: BAN 146/6 BAN 42% Bangladesh’s wickets tumbled and
      they looked like they were in danger of being bowled out. Bangladesh’s chances remained the same during this period.
arrow 44.1 Overs: BAN 174/10 BAN 31% Bangladesh failed to take the
      batting powerplay as they were bowled out for a paltry total.Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 11% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (New Zealand: Target 175)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 10 Overs: NZ 34/5 NZ 52% The New Zealand line-up crumbled
      once again, falling like nine-pins . New Zealand’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: NZ 84/5 NZ 31% New Zealand found the going
      extremely tough against some very disciplined Bangladesh bowling. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 17% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: NZ 129/7 NZ 31% A whitewash was definitely on the
      cards as once again it was left to the tail to complete the job. New Zealand’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 49.3 Overs: NZ 171/10 BAN 100% In a cracker of a match,
      Bangladesh were victorious once again as New Zealand could not cross the finish line. Bangladesh won by 3 runs and whitewash New Zealand 4-0.


The Stats Team 590
163 SA v ZIM, 1st ODI, Match Report

1st ODI: South Africa v Zimbabwe (Winner: SA)

SA 351/6 (C Ingram 124, H Amla 110, D Miller 51, S Masakadza 4/86) beat ZIM 287/6 (B Taylor 145, J Theron 3/62, J Botha 2/41) by 64 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: C Ingram OUTsurance Oval, Bloemfontein (15 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

South Africa got off to a flier before Smith fell but with Amla in the form of his life, boundaries didn’t cease. By the time Amla was out the total was 201 in 32 overs and the COW was 61%. Ingram continued in company for AB first and Duminy later to record his maiden century and take South Africa to 351 with a COW of 74%. Zimbabwe got off a much needed good start but Taylor was fighting a lone battle as wickets fell at regular intervals. Their COW dipped below 20% after 23rd over as they reached 123/3. Even the brilliant 145* by Taylor was never going to be enough when the target was so big and in the end Zimbabwe scored 287/6 to lose by 64 runs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 12 Overs: SA 89/1 SA 58% South Africa started in grand fashion
      destroying the Zimbabwean bowling from the onset. South Africa’s chances increased by 7% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: SA 164/1 SA 61% South Africa continued to cart the
      Zimbabwean bowling getting a huge total by the halfway point. South Africa’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: SA 235/2 SA 64% South Africa had set up a huge
      base for getting a mammoth total, while Amla reached yet another century. South Africa’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 351/6 SA 74% South Africa did indeed get a
      mammoth total, with Zimbabwe’s chances of overhauling this total remaining bleak. South Africa’s chances increased by 10% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Zimbabwe: Target 352)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 13 Overs: ZIM 73/1 ZIM 24% Zimbabwe stared brightly but
      with such an enormous target, that was not going to be enough. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: ZIM 128/3 ZIM 17% Zimbabwe looked like they had
      resigned to defeat, the required rate shooting to 9 an over. Zimbabwe’s chances increased by 7% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: ZIM 190/5 ZIM 1% By now, the result was a formality,
      the only debating point was the margin of defeat. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 16% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: ZIM 286/6 SA 100% Despite the heroics of Taylor,
      Zimbabwe fell woefully short as he received little support from the other batsmen (Grant Flower included). South Africa won by 64 runs.


The Stats Team 719
164 NZ v BAN, 4th ODI, Match Report

4th ODI: New Zealand v Bangladesh (Winner: BAN)

BAN 241 (S Hasan 106, I Kayes 37, H Bennett 3/44, D Vettori 2/35) beat NZ 232 (K Williamson 108, N McCullum 33, S Hasan 3/54, S Islam 2/39) by 9 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Hasan Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur (14 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

After losing 2 matches, New Zealand were expected to show some fightback and they knocked off 3 Bangldeshi wickets early to take charge but 4th wicket stand between imrul and Shakib took them to 97 in 18 with a COW of 47%. Shakib continued to be their lone ranger putting together stands with Mushfiqur and Mahmadullah, as he scored a century. But a late collapse saw them end up at 241 with a COW of 43%. Bangladesh took three quick wickets and the spinner choked the run rate just like in previous matches. Kane Williamson chose the occasion to finally play like a batsman and scored a brilliant century and his stand with Nathan McCullum looked to swing the match their way, but the required rate was too high and wickets fell as they tried to accelerate as they stumbled to a 9 run defeat.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Bangladesh)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 12 Overs: BAN 70/3 BAN 47% Bangladesh started with a bang
      however it proved costly as they lost 3 quick wickets. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 24 Overs: BAN 123/4 BAN 47% Bangladesh consolidated and ensured
      that the innings remained stable. Bangladesh’s chances remained the same during this period.
arrow 36 Overs: BAN 185/5 BAN 47% Shakib Al-hasan controlled the
      Bangladesh innings, keeping it stable. Bangladesh’s chances remained the same during this period.
arrow 48.1 Overs: BAN 241/10 BAN 43% Bangladesh could not build on
      the captain’s century , losing wickets by the bucketful and ending on a mediocre score. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (New Zealand: Target 242)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 13 Overs: NZ 51/3 NZ 52% New Zealand troubles against the
      Bangladeshi bowling attack continued as they struggled for runs, while losing wickets. New Zealand;s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: NZ 108/5 NZ 48% Bangladesh gained the upper hand
      as the New Zealand top order fell under disciplined Bangladeshi bowling. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: NZ 153/5 NZ 41% Kane Williamson and Grant Elliot
      kept New Zealand’s hopes alive but the require rate was shooting relentlessly. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 49.3 Overs: NZ 232/10 BAN 100% Kane Williamson’s maiden ODI ton
      went in vain, as the lack of support meant that Bangladesh achieved a historic victory. Bangladesh won the match by 9 runs and lead the series by 3-0.


The Stats Team 652
165 NZ v BAN, 3rd ODI, Match Report

3rd ODI: New Zealand v Bangladesh (Winner: BAN)

NZ 173 (R Taylor 62*, S Shuvo 3/14, Mahmudullah 2/6, S Hasan 2/45) lost to BAN 177/3 (S Nafees 73, I Kayes 50, N McCullum 2/31, A McKay 1/28) by 7 wickets with 60 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Shuvo Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur (11 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Everyone expected NZ to bounce back in this match with better bating performance. But the things didn’t go as per plan as McCullum fell for a duck. Ryder and Watling batter slowly and sensibly to take them to 54/1 in 13 with COW of 49% before great spells by Shakib and Shuvo saw them stumble to 100/6 in 32 overs with a COW of 36%. Taylor and Mills revived the innings with a hard hitting stand but once Mills fell, Mahmadullah cleaned up the tail and NZ ended at 173 runs with a COW of 34%. Any hopes Kiwis might have had were snuffed out as Imrul and Shahriar put together 127 runs for the first wicket as Bangladesh’s COW went up to 82%. After that it was just academic as Bangladesh cruised home with 10 overs to spare to claim their first ever series win over another test playing nation.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (New Zealand)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 13 Overs: NZ 54/1 NZ 49% Bangladesh went slightly in front,
      with their spinners putting the brakes on a decent New Zealand start. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 24 Overs: NZ 79/5 NZ 42% Bangladesh choked New Zealand
      on this slow,low track as the runs dried up. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 33 Overs: NZ 101/7 NZ 35% Bangladesh’s pythonlike grip on
      New Zealand continued as New Zealand fell to a humiliating position. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 42.5 Overs: NZ 178/10 NZ 34% After Mills and Taylor made full
      use of the powerplay, sparking a revival, New Zealand’s last 3 wickets fell very cheaply giving them an embarrassingly low total. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Bangladesh: Target 179)-50 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 10 Overs: BAN 58/0 BAN 73% Bangladesh got off to an incredible
      start, making a mockery of the target. Bangladesh ‘s chances increased by 7% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: BAN 102/0 BAN 80% Nothing could go wrong for Bangladesh
      today as they powered to a 100+ opening partnership . Bangladesh ‘s chances increased by 7% during this period.
arrow 30 Overs: BAN 141/2 BAN 81% Bangladesh’s chase reached a slight
      snag as they lost 2 wickets and also with it some momentum.Bangladesh ‘s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 40 Overs: BAN 177/3 BAN 100% The captain scored the winning runs
      and Bangladesh finished the match with 10 overs to spare. Bangladesh won by 7 wickets.


The Stats Team 558
166 SA v ZIM, 2nd T20I, Match Report

2nd T20I: South Africa v Zimbabwe (Winner: SA)

SA 194/6 (JP Duminy 96*, G Smith 46, P Utseya 2/28, S Masakadza 2/39) beat ZIM 186/7 (B Taylor 59, C Chibhabha 59, J Theron 2/27, R Peterson 2/36) by 8 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: JP Duminy De Beers Diamond Oval, Kimberley (10 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

After being demolished in the 1st T20 Zimbabwe had another chance to prove their worthiness. SA went in to bat first this time and for some time it looked like Zim had their measure as the lost 2 early wickets but Smith and Duminy combined to take them to 82/3 in 10 with a COW of 53%. Duminy once again destroyed Zim bowling attack with an unbeaten 96 as SA reached 194/6 in 20 with a COW of 60%. No one gave Zimbabwe any chance of getting near this one but Taylor and Chibhabha nearly proved them wrong. They took Zim to 113/1 in 13 with COW of 40% and suddenly it looked feasible but once they got out Chigumbura got no support and they fell short by 8 runs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)-20 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 5 Overs: SA 48/2 SA 53% Despite the loss of 2 wickets,
      South Africa were going at a very good rate. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: SA 82/3 SA 53% South Africa slowed down considerably
      during this period, reducing their run-rate.South Africa’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: SA 127/3 SA 55% South kept a good partnership going
      increasing their chances. South Africa’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SA 194/6 SA 60% South African and especially
      JP Duminy went berserk during this period getting a massive total in the process. South Africa’s chances increased by 5% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Zimbabwe: Target 195)-20 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 5 Overs: ZIM 35/1 SA 66% Zimbabwe did quite have the
      start that the situation required putting them on the backfoot. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: ZIM 89/1 SA 63% The partnership of Taylor and
      Chibhabha surprised South Africa with an unexpected assault. Zimbabwe’s chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: ZIM 139/3 SA 67% Zimbabwe were continuing at a
      quick pace, but wickets did not help their cause. Zimbabwe’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: ZIM 186/7 SA 100% Zimbabwe came close but they
      could not cross the finish line as they fell short by 8 runs. South Africa won by 8 runs.


The Stats Team 547
167 SA v ZIM, 1st T20I, Match Report

1st T20I: South Africa v Zimbabwe (Winner: SA)

ZIM 168/4 (H Masakadza 72, C Chibhabha 52, W Parnell 2/29, J Theron 1/33) lost to SA 169/3 (G Smith 58, D Miller 36*, JP Duminy 35*, P Utseya 2/41) by 7 wickets with 25 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: G Smith OUTsurance Oval, Bloemfontein (8 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

Zimbabwe were clearly nobody’s favourites and it showed as they lost Taylor early and struggled to 22/1 in 5 overs with COW of 43% before Masakadza and Chibhabha surprised the South Africans and perhaps themselves to as they displayed aggressive intent and took them to 96/1 in 13 with COW of 52% before Chibhabha fell and then remaining batsmen built on that to take them to an impressive 168/4 with a COW of 58%. South Africa received a rude awakening and that showed as they raced away to 78/0 in 6 over with a COW of 54% and Smith and Bosman took the Zimbabwe attack to the cleaners. Zimbabwe fought back with 3 quick wickets but Duminy and Miller continued the onslaught to wrap up the match in 15.5 overs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Zimbabwe)-20 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 5 Overs: ZIM 22/1 ZIM 43% Zimbabwe really struggled in the
      start and lost their Brendon Taylor early as they could put together just 22 runs in the first 5 overs and as a result their COW dipped by 4%.
arrow 10 Overs: ZIM 63/1 ZIM 46% Masakadza and Chibhabha started
      playing shots and surprised the Saffers with their belligerence as 41 runs came off the next 5 overs and Zimbabwe’s COW recovered by 3%.
arrow 15 Overs: ZIM 110/2 ZIM 52% Chibhabha and Masakadza stepped on
      the gas as they attempted to take the run rate up. Zimbabwe lost Chibhabha but still managed to score 47 runs in 5 overs and their COW jumped by 6%.
arrow 20 Overs: ZIM 168/4 ZIM 58% Zimbabwe went all out in the last
      5 overs to push their score higher up. As a result they lost 2 more wickets but scored 58 more runs and more crucially raised their COW by another 6%.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 169)-20 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 5 Overs: SA 64/0 SA 51% South Africa needed a good start
      to chase down 168 and they got off to a absolute flier as Smith and Bosman collected 64 runs in the first 5 overs and increased their COW by 9%.
arrow 10 Overs: SA 106/3 SA 56% Zimbabwe hit back with 3 quick
      wickets but 42 runs still came off these 5 overs and crucially kept the run rate ahead as South Africa’s COW after 10 overs increased by 5%.
arrow 15 Overs: SA 155/3 SA 75% Duminy and Miller continued to attack
      and added 49 runs in next 5 overs as Zimbabwe bowlers failed to make any in roads and South Africa increased their COW by 19% in this period.
arrow 15.5 Overs: SA 169/3 SA 100% It took South Africa just 5 more
      deliveries to score the 14 runs needed for victory as Duminy smashed Utseya for a six to seal the match and give South Africa 1-0 lead in the series.


The Stats Team 565
168 NZ v BAN, 1st ODI, Match Report

1st ODI: New Zealand v Bangladesh (Winner: BAN)

BAN 228 (S Hasan 58, S Naffes 35, K Mills 3/44, D Vettori 2/29) beat NZ 200/8 (B McCullum 61, R Taylor 42, S Hasan 4/41, N Islam 2/30) by 9 runs(D/L method).

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Hasan Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur (5 Oct,2010)
cow-analysis

New Zealand arrived on this tour expecting easy wins. Bangladesh had a point to prove to those who questioned their ODI team status. First ODI kicked off with Bangladesh without their best batsmen, Tamim Iqbal, who was out with injury. Bangladesh got off to a very slow start before picking up some momentum but a fall of wicket got them to just 61/1 in 15 overs with COW of 45% and 100/2 in 25 with COW of 42%. It took a fighting fifty from their go to guy, Shakib Al Hasan, seemed to put them back on track but another collapse saw them stumble to 228 in 49.3 overs with a COW of 41%. New Zealand got off to a flyer with McCullum and Ryder matching shot for shot as they raced to 49/0 in 6 overs with a COW of 67%. Ryder fell but McCullum continued and by the time Bangladesh got McCullum out in a double strike Kiwis were 85/4 in 15 overs with COW of 64%. But rains there after meant that Kiwis had to chase 210 runs in 37 overs. Seemed simple but the Bangladeshi spinners claimed 7 wickets between and never really let Kiwis get a stronghold as they restricted them too 200/8 to win by 9 runs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Bangladesh)-50 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 10 Overs: BAN 42/1 NZ 55% After a very slow start Bangladesh
      got back to a normal rate before their 1st wicket fell. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: BAN 100/2 NZ 58% Bangladesh continued at 4 per
      over, going through the motion with their batting. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 39 Overs: BAN 169/4 NZ 57% Bangladesh’s position did not
      change much despite losing 2 wickets, because they had a platform for the death. Bangladesh’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 49.3 Overs: BAN 229/10 NZ 59% Bangladesh lost wickets in a hurry
      as reached a mediocre total. Bangladesh’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (New Zealand: Target 230)-37 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 12 Overs: NZ 72/2 NZ 69% New Zealand started with a bang
      as Brendon McCullum flayed the bowling to all parts of the ground. New Zealand’s chances increased by 10% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: NZ 135/5 NZ 60% New Zealand lost wickets in
      a heap after a rain delay gave them a new and more difficult target . New Zealand’s chances decreased by 9% during this period.
arrow 31 Overs: NZ 163/7 BAN 55% New Zealand went deeper into
      the mire leaving the tail with a difficult task. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 15% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: NZ 200/8 BAN 100% New Zealand suffered an ignominious
      defeat as Bangladesh pulled an upset from under the rug. Bangladesh won by 10 runs.


The Stats Team 591
169 NZ v SL, 1st T20I, Match Report

1st T20I: New Zealand v Sri Lanka (Winner: NZ)

NZ 120/7 (R Taylor 27, D Vettori 21*, A Mendis 2/18) beat SL 92 (A Mathews 27, S Styris 3/10, K Mills 2/17, A McKay 2/20) by 28 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Styris Central Broward Regional Park Stadium Turf Ground, Lauderhill(22 May,2010)
cow-analysis

NZ were slight underdogs in the opening T20 match of this 2 match series with Sri Lanka. Their batmen’s inability to stay at the crease for long didn’t help their cause. Apart from Taylor, Vettori and to some extent McCullum, no one paid heed to Coach’s instructions and their innings never gathered any real momentum. Kiwis ended their innings with 120 runs and a COW of 36%. Sri Lankans were firm favourites to chase this down but they also struggled with the bat reaching 50/3 in 10 allowing Kiwis to raise their COW to 48%. With the required run rate going up they succumbed under tight bowling and fielding. Angela Mathews was the lone ranger but there was little he could do as Sri Lankan innings folded up for just 92 runs.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (New Zealand)  
 
arrow 5 Overs: NZ 32/2 SL 54% New Zealand started the first
      international match in the USA in lukewarm fashion losing 2 wickets at the start.New Zealand’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: NZ 54/3 SL 60% On a bowler friendly pitch,
      New Zealand struggled to score runs as they went to only 54 after 10 overs. New Zealand’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: NZ 85/5 SL 65% New Zealand continued to
      struggle with run-scoring as wickets kept falling .New Zealand’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: NZ 120/7 SL 64% New Zealand got to a sub-par
      total as the death overs saw batting resembling a T20 match. New Zealand’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Sri Lanka: Target 121)  
     
arrow 5 Overs: SL 21/2 SL 56% Sri Lanka’s start was worse
      than that of New Zealand as they scored even fewer runs while losing the same number of wickets. Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 8% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: SL 50/3 SL 53% Sri Lanka’s innings was going
      the same way as the New Zealand one, however they had enough firepower to take them home. Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: SL 70/6 NZ 60% Sri Lanka’s famed middle order
      came to nought as they went out cheaply. Sri Lanka’s chances decreased by 17% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SL 91/10 NZ 100% It was unlikely that cricket would
      have gained converts in USA following this limp batting display by both team as Sri Lanka dawdled to 91. New Zealand won by 29 runs.


The Stats Team 487
170 WI v SA, 5th ODI, Match Report

5th ODI: West Indies v South Africa (Winner: SA)

WI 252/6 (S Chanderpaul 67, N Deonarine 53, L Tsotsobe 2/31) lost to SA 255/9 (J Kallis 57, JP Duminy 51, C Gayle 2/38, K Pollard 2/42) by 1 wicket with 2 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: J Kallis Queen's Park Oval, Port of Spain, Trinidad (3 June,2010)
cow-analysis

In the 5th match West Indies’ innings was typical stop-start innings with almost every batsman getting a start and throwing it away. Only Chanderpaul and Deonarine showed some mettle with gritty fifties as West Indies struggled to meet last match’s exploits and scored 252 runs for a COW of 51%. The total was not huge but there was little something in the pitch for the bowlers. South Africa’s story was similar, however Amla, Kallis and Duminy scored fifties to ensure that COW never got too low. However a late fight back by West Indies bowlers saw the match go down to the wire with South Africans scampering through in the last over to win the match by 1 wicket and the series 5-0.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (West Indies)  
 
arrow 10 Overs: WI 44/1 SA 54% West Indies started slow with
      only 44 runs in the first 10 overs for the loss of Dale Richards. West Indies chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 24 Overs: WI 95/2 SA 59% West Indies failed to accelerate
      as their run-rate dropped below 4 at the halfway mark. West Indies chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 39 Overs: WI 153/4 SA 65% The West Indies innings was
      meandering along at this point again below 4 per over. West Indies chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: WI 252/6 WI 51% West Indies blitzed at 9 an over
      during the death to finish above 250. West Indies chances increased by 16% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 253)  
     
arrow 13 Overs: SA 68/1 WI 52% The South African innings had
      a decent enough start going along with the run-rate but losing a wicket. South Africa’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 32 Overs: SA 168/3 SA 57% South Africa were going along
      with the run-rate and crucially they had 7 wickets in hand. South Africa’s chances increased by 9% during this period.
arrow 43 Overs: SA 210/5 SA 51% South Africa’s position became
      slightly precarious as they lost 2 more wickets and the run-rate increased to 6. South Africa’s chances decreased by 6% during this period.
arrow 49.4 Overs: SA 255/9 SA 100% South Africa nearly choked twice
      as they lost a flurry of wickets with the target nearing, finally winning with 2 balls remaining with the runs coming from the No.11 batsman. South Africa won by 1 wicket.


The Stats Team 535
171 CL T20, Chennai Super Kings v Warriors, Final, Match Report

Final: Chennai Super Kings v Warriors (Winner: CSK)

Warriors 128/7 (Jacobs 34, Muralitharan 16/3, Ashwin 16/2) lost to CSK 132/2 (Vijay 58, Hussey 51*, Boje 29/1) by 8 wickets with 6 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match:M Vijay New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg (26 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

CSK took on Warriors in the CLT20 final with a COW of 53%. Batting first, Warriors went off on a flier but a Bollinger full toss got rid of Prince. Soon Jacobs’ enterprising knock also ended as Warriors reached 47/2 at the end of 6 overs with a COW of 47%. CSK spinners once again strangled the Warriors middle order and picked regular wickets and it took some wild hits from Thyssen to take them to 128/7 with a COW of 36%. CSK got off to a slow and steady start before Hussey and Vijay opened up and soon CSK were 70/0 in 11 with COW of 83%. Vijay and Raina fell trying to end match quickly but Hussey and Dhoni saw CSK home in 19 overs and CSK became the CLT20 champions.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Warriors)  
 
arrow 5 Overs: WAR 44/1 CSK 51% Warriors started aggressively, and
      although they lost Prince, they still scored quite well. Warriors chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: WAR 66/2 CSK 56% Chennai applied the squeeze as
      they stemmed the flow of runs. Warriors chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: WAR 86/5 CSK 64% Warriors went into deeper trouble
      as runs scoring became difficult while they lost 3 wickets. Warriors chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: WAR 128/7 CSK 64% Warriors ended up with a mediocre
      total far less than they would have liked. Warriors chances increased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Chennai Super Kings: Target 129)  
     
arrow 5 Overs: CSK 31/0 CSK 67% Chennai started steadily but
      importantly did not lose any wickets. Chennai Super Kings chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: CSK 65/0 CSK 82% Chennai kept the opening
      partnership going making the situation very comfortable for them. Chennai Super Kings chances increased by 15% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: CSK 103/1 CSK 91% The wicket of M Vijay made no
      impact as Hussey kept his cool. Chennai Super Kings chances increased by 9% during this period.
arrow 19 Overs: CSK 132/2 CSK 100% It was fitting that the winning
      runs were scored by the Captain who finished proceedings with an over to spare. Chennai Super Kings won by 8 wickets.


The Stats Team 757
172 CL T20, Warriors v South Australia, 2nd Semi-final, Match Report

2nd Semi-final: Warriors v South Australia (Winner: Warriors)

Warriors 175/6 (D Jacobs 61, C Ingram 46, D Harris 3/18, S Tait 2/38) beat South Australia 145/7 (C Ferguson 71, L Tsotsobe 2/16, J Botha 2/34) by 30 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: D Jacobs SuperSport Park, Centurion (25 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

Warriors went up against the only unbeaten team in CLT20, South Australia Redbacks, in the 2nd Semifinal. Tait removed Prince early but Jacobs and Ingram absolutely hammered their bowling in a stand that took them to 105 in 12 overs before Jacobs fell. Their COW at that point was 55%. A tight spell from Harris saw them restrict Warriors till Boje opened up towards the end to take them to 175/6 in 20 with a COW of 55%. Redbacks lost their heroes Klinger and Harris early on and after that it was purely a struggle as they reached 60/4 in 10 with COW of 35%. Late charge by Ferguson raised some hopes but the target was too big and they eventually ended at 145/7 as Warriors reached the finals.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Warriors)  
 
arrow 5 Overs: WAR 50/1 WAR 52% Warriors lost Prince early, but
      that did not matter as Jacobs continued in fine form.Warriors chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: WAR 89/1 WAR 53% Warriors consolidated their
      advantage as South Australia faltered in the field. Warriors chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: WAR 122/3 WAR 52% Warriors slowed down a bit,
      due to the loss of 2 wickets. Warriors chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: WAR 175/6 WAR 55% The Warriors middle order
      provided the necessary impetus .Warriors chances increased by 3% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Australia: Target 176)  
     
arrow 5 Overs: SA 34/2 WAR 58% South Australia were behind
      the eight-ball from the outset, losing 2 early wickets. South Australia’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: SA 60/4 WAR 65% South Australia’s position did
      not during this period as they lost 2 more wickets during this period, with an enormous required rate. South Australia’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: SA 104/4 WAR 56% South Australia maintained their
      wickets and even started counter-attacking improving their chances. South Australia’s chances increased by 9% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SA 145/7 WAR 100% The required rate was too high
      for South Australia who fell woefully short of the target.Warriors won by 30 runs.


The Stats Team 619
173 CL T20, Chennai Super Kings v Royal Challengers Bangalore, 1st Semi-final, Match Report

1st Semi-final: CSK v RCB (Winner:CSK)

CSK 174/4 (S Raina 94*, M Vijay 41, V Kumar 2/28) beat RCB 123 (M Pandey 52, D Bollinger 3/27, M Murlitharan 2/38) by 52 runs (D/L method).

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: S Raina Kingsmead, Durban (24 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

CSK took on RCB in the Semifinal with both teams having equal COW. CSK got off to slow start before rains interrupted. By the time match was resumed it was reduced to 17 overs. CSK lost a wicket straight away but RCB lost a lot more as Steyn got injured taking the catch. CSK exploited this by manhandling the 5th bowler. Raina and Vijay took them to 97/1 in 11 with COW of 49% before Vijay got out. But Raina continued his big hitting and smote 6 sixes in his 94 run inning as CSK scored 174 runs in 17 overs to end with a COW of 58%. RCB kept losing wickets at regular interval and seemed to be out of contest as they reached 57/4 in 10 with COW of just 14%. A fighting 50 from Manish Pandey and few blows from P Kumar were never going to be enough as they were bowled out for 123 in 16.2 overs as CSK reached their first CLT20 final.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Chennai Super Kings)- 17 Overs Maximum  
 
arrow 4 Overs: CSK 23/1 RCB 53% Chennai Super Kings had a rain
      interrupted star which worked against them due to their slow start, the catch of Michael Hussey turned dangerous for Bangalore as Steyn suffered a concussion. Chennai Super Kings chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 8 Overs: CSK 71/1 CSK 50% The exit of Hussey led to the entry
      of Raina who flailed the Bangalore bowling who were without Steyn . Chennai Super Kings chances increased by 3% during this period.
arrow 12 Overs: CSK 106/2 RCB 51% Chennai lost M Vijay as Chennai
      continued at a par pace. Chennai Super Kings chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 17 Overs: CSK 174/4 CSK 58% Nothing was going right for
      Bangalore, with the exact opposite happening in the Chennai camp, Raina going crazy and smashing everything in sight. Chennai Super Kings chances decreased by 9% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Royal Challengers Bangalore: Target 176)- 17 Overs Maximum  
     
arrow 4 Overs: RCB 16/3 CSK 70% Facing a steep total, Bangalore
      needed an exhilarating start, but what they got, as the scoreline attests, was the exact opposite. Royal Challengers Bangalore chances decreased by 12% during this period.
arrow 8 Overs: RCB 40/4 CSK 84% With such a terrible start,
      Bangalore could only play catch up from here onwards. Royal Challengers Bangalore chances decreased by 14% during this period.
arrow 12 Overs: RCB 84/6 CSK 92% This chase was looking farcical,
      as Bangalore needed the tail to score at over 20 per over. Royal Challengers Bangalore chances decreased by 8% during this period.
arrow 16.2 Overs: RCB 123/9 CSK 100% Bangalore were without the
      services of Steyn with the bat as well, causing Bangalore to be bowled out withing 17 overs. Chennai Super Kings won by 52 runs.


The Stats Team 789
174 WI v SA, 4th ODI, Match Report

4th ODI: West Indies v South Africa (Winner: SA)

WI 303/6 (S Chanderpaul 66, D Richards 59, L Tsotsobe 2/48, C Langeveldt 2/59) lost to SA 304/3 (H Amla 129, AB de Villiers 57*, J Kallis 51*, D Bravo 1/41) by 7 wickets.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: H Amla Windsor Park, Roseau, Dominica (30 May,2010)
cow-analysis

West Indies tried to change the script by batting first and got off to a good start too with Richards and Chanderpaul scoring fifties. By the time they were separated the score was 115/2 in 23rd over and the COW was at 50%. Then Bravo brothers and Pollard combined push the score with big hitting as West Indies ended their 50 overs with 303 runs and a COW of 59%. South Africa were up for the chase with Amla once again they lynchpin as he partnered Smith, Kallis and AB in succession while scoring another century to take the score to 224/3 in 38th over and raised the COW to 65%. AB and Duminy batted sensibly to take the team home off the last ball for a 4-0 lead.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (West Indies)  
 
arrow 9 Overs: WI 60/0 WI 54% Chris Gayle and Dale Richards
      provided their team with an excellent start, getting his team off the block with style. West Indies chances increased by 5% during this period.
arrow 22 Overs: WI 112/1 WI 51% West Indies slowed down after
      their start, losing the wicket of Gayle did not help. West Indies chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: WI 187/2 SA 51% West Indies let the advantage slip
      from their grasp as the run-rate slipped too. West Indies chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: WI 303/6 WI 59% West Indies accelerated during
      the death overs, due to which they were able to cross 300. West Indies chances increased by 10% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (South Africa: Target 304)  
     
arrow 9 Overs: SA 55/0 WI 58% South Africa had a start that
      was very similar to that of West Indies, an aggressive opening partnership. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 29 Overs: SA 175/1 SA 62% South Africa were cruising at this
      stage with 2 well settled batsmen at the crease, wickets in hand and a manageable run-rate. South Africa’s chances increased by 20% during this period.
arrow 40 Overs: SA 235/3 SA 63% South Africa were going good
      at this stage, they lost 2 more wickets but that did not seem to matter much. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 304/3 SA 100% South Africa nearly made a hash
      of what should have been a comfortable chase. South Africa win off the last ball with 7 wickets in hand.


The Stats Team 464
175 WI v SA, 3rd ODI, Match Report

3rd ODI: West Indies v South Africa (Winner: SA)

SA 224 (AB de Villiers 70, H Amla 34, K Pollard 3/27, S Benn 2/43) beat WI 157 (D Richards 28, M Morkel 4/21, C Langeveldt 3/30) by 67 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: AB de Villiers Windsor Park, Roseau, Dominica (28 May,2010)
cow-analysis

Despite regular wickets South Africa were off to a decent start and reached 113/3 in 22nd with a COW of 49%. AB held up one end with a fighting fifty as others caved in. South Africa’s innings was never really in top gear and they were all out for 224 in 48 over with a COW of 41%. But West Indies team has a reputation for getting things wrong. Langeveldt and Morkel destroyed their batting lineup with 7 wickets between them. Not a single batsman crossed 30 as West Indies collapsed to 157 all out in 38 overs to lose the series 3-0.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)  
 
arrow 9 Overs: SA 52/0 SA 52% South Africa once again had a
      strong, aggressive opening partnership as they reached their 50 quickly. South Africa’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 21 Overs: SA 112/2 SA 51% South Africa’s run-rate hovered
      above 5 at this point but they lost 2 wicket in this this period. South Africa’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 34 Overs: SA 162/4 WI 56% West Indies gained the upper hand
      as the South African innings ossified during this period. South Africa’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 47.2 Overs: SA 224/10 WI 59% South Africa’s innings petered
      out to a mediocre total after a promising start. South Africa’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (West Indies: Target 225)  
     
arrow 11 Overs: WI 58/1 WI 58% West Indies were along with the
      required rate but the crucial wicket of Gayle was lost in this period. West Indies chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 23 Overs: WI 91/4 SA 53% South Africa gained the upper
      hand again as West Indies lost their way by losing 3 wickets. West Indies chances decreased by 11% during this period.
arrow 38 Overs: WI 157/10 SA 100% Despite the low target, West Indies
      just could not reach it, losing their wickets in a heap. South Africa won by 67 runs.
arrow      
       


The Stats Team 503
176 WI v SA, 2nd ODI, Match Report

2nd ODI: West Indies v South Africa (Winner: SA)

SA 300/5 (H Amla 92, J Kallis 85, K Pollard 2/39, J Taylor 2/50) beat WI 283 (D Bravo 74, D Sammy 58*, M Morkel 3/58) by 17 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: H Amla Sir Vivian Richards Stadium, North Sound, Antigua (24 May,2010)
cow-analysis

Once again South Africa got off to a good start with 89 runs partnership for the first wicket. After Smith got out Kallis built the innings first with Amla and then with AB to reach 239/3 in 43rd over. With top 4 bastsmen answering Coach’s call it was no surprise that they ended up with 300 runs and a COW of 54%. West Indies were surprisingly circumspect chasing a big total and trundled to 45/1 in 11th with a COW of 33%.They needed one big partnership to recover but that never happened. Apart from Richards’ and Bravo’s fifties no one really contributed till Sammy scored an explosive fifty to turn the match around but eventually ran out of partners as West indies were all out for 283.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Africa)  
 
arrow 15 Overs: SA 83/0 SA 55% South Africa started very nicely
      with a belligerent opening partnership between Loots Bosman and Graeme Smith. South Africa’s chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 31 Overs: SA 167/1 SA 54% South Africa’s run-rate dropped
      a bit during this period, they also lost a wicket too. South Africa’s chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 42 Overs: SA 238/2 SA 56% Despite the loss of a wicket,
      South Africa’s scored at over a 6 per over during this period. South Africa’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: SA 300/5 SA 54% South Africa got themselves a very
      good target but they could have got some more runs. South Africa’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (West Indies: Target 301)  
     
arrow 10 Overs: WI 40/0 SA 65% Chris Gayle was not his usual
      aggressive self during the start and the required run-rate had reached 6.5 already. West Indies chances decreased by 11% during this period.
arrow 27 Overs: WI 116/2 SA 74% West Indies did not accelerate
      during this period, and losing 2 wickets made their jobs even harder. West Indies chances dropped by 9% during this period.
arrow 38 Overs: WI 182/3 SA 75% West Indies scored at a run a
      ball but they also lost another wicket. West Indies chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 48.1 Overs: WI 283/10 SA 100% After a flurry of Wickets, it seemed
      the Windies were going to be routed but an astonishing innings from Darran Sammy gave them a chance of victory. In the end he only reduced the victory margin to 17 runs for the South Africans.


The Stats Team 447
177 CL T20, Royal Challengers Bangalore v Lions, 18th T20, Match Report

18th T20, Group B: Royal Challengers Bangalore v Lions (Winner: RCB)

Lions 159/6 (A Petersen 45, N McKenzie 39, V Kumar 2/23) lost RCB 160/4 (V Kohli 49*, M Pandey 44, R Dravid 33, C Deacon 1/21) by 6 wickets with 6 balls remaining.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: V Kohli New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg (21 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

RCB lost the last match narrowly and went in to this match knowing that nothing but a win would do. After a double jolt Lions roared back and by the time 3rd wicket fell they were going strong at 74/3 in 8 with COW of 48%. Petersen continued the good work in company of McKenzie ad some late fireworks from Frylinck saw them post a competitive 159/6 with COW of 47%. RCB got off to a slow but steady start that saw them reach 48/0 in 7 with COW of 50%. After Dravid’s dismissal Pandey and Kohli raised the scoring rate that saw them reach 89/2 in 12 with COW of 48%. Few more wickets fell leaving them struggling at 117/4 in 16 with a COW of just 40% but Kohli and White smashed the bowlers around and finished off the match with a whole over to spare.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Lions)  
 
arrow 5 Overs: Lions 43/2 RCB 53% The Lions started out with a bang
      provided by Alviro Petersen but 2 wickets spoiled the party. Highveld Lions chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: Lions 83/3 RCB 54% The Lions consolidated a bit during
      this period maintaining the run-rate. Highveld Lions chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: Lions 111/4 RCB 55% The Lions slipped during this period
      as Kumble applied his stranglehold. Highveld Lions chances decreased by 1% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: Lions 159/6 RCB 53% The Lions finally got some release
      during the death overs as they plundered 48 runs off the last 5. Highveld Lions chances increased by 2% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Royal Challengers Bangalore: Target 160)  
     
arrow 5 Overs: RCB 31/0 Lions 51% Bangalore began their innings in a
      solid but cautious manner, which increased the required rate. Royal Challengers Bangalore chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: RCB 78/1 RCB 52% Bangalore made amends for their
      start by accelerating during this period keeping them on par with the run-rate.Royal Challengers Bangalore chances increased by 5% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: RCB 112/4 Lions 57% Bangalore lost a few wickets during
      this period while the required rate shot to nearly 10.Royal Challengers Bangalore chances decreased by 9% during this period.
arrow 19 Overs: RCB 160/4 RCB 100% Virat Kohli made amends for his
      previous match by staying till the end in this match and pushing Bangalore above the line.Royal Challengers Bangalore won by 6 wickets.


The Stats Team 605
178 CL T20, South Australia v Guyana, 17th T20, Match Report

17th T20, Group B: South Australia v Guyana (Winner: SA)

South Australia 191/6 (C Ferguson 55, C Borgas 48, P Wintz 2/11, D Bishoo 2/22) beat Guyana 176/7 (R Sarwan 70, R Ramdeen 35 , D Harris 3/33, D Christian 2/20) by 15 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: C Ferguson New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg (21 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

Redbacks went in to this match unbeaten and Guyana had not even come close to winning any of theirs so we knew who the favourite was. But Guyana showed glimpses of why they are the Caribbean champions as the Redbacks struggled to 43/3 off 6 with a COW of 50%. But Guyana were unable to keep the standard of their game up and poor bowling plus sub standard fielding let Redbacks right back in. Ferguson and Borgas took the opportunity to take them to 130/4 in 16 with COW of 52% and lusty blows at the end saw then notch the tournament’s highest score of 191/6 with COW of 59%. Dowling fell early but then Ramdeen and Jacobs helped Sarwan put up a fight as they reached 108/3 in 13 with COW of 40%. But as time came to accelerate and grab victory wickets kept falling and even Sarwan’s inning of 70 was not enough as they ended up at 176/7 and exited the tournament without a win.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (South Australia)  
 
arrow 5 Overs: SA 40/2 SA 51% South Australia started poorly in
      this inconsequential match , losing 2 early wickets ruining their start. South Australia’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 10 Overs: SA 68/3 GUY 51% Guyana applied the squeeze during
      this period as they took the upper hand by prising another wicket. South Australia’s chances decreased by 2% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: SA 125/3 SA 53% South Australia fought back
      aggressively and in style as they plundered runs. South Australia’s chances increased by 4% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: SA 191/6 SA 59% Guyana lost it in the death by
      bowling tripe, which was gladly gobbled up by South Australia. South Australia’s chances increased by 6% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Guyana: Target 192)  
     
arrow 5 Overs: GUY 36/1 SA 59% Guyana had a very similar start to
      South Australia with an advantage lying in the fact that they lost 1 fewer wicket . Guyana’s chances did not change during this period.
arrow 11 Overs: GUY 94/2 SA 57% Guyana was this target a go,
      powering along at a run-rate above 8. Guyana’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 15 Overs: GUY 128/4 SA 66% Guyana choked as they lost 2
      wickets during this period severely denting their chances. Guyana’s chances decreased by 9% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: GUY 176/7 SA 100% Guyana get that losing feeling
      again, however this time they go down fighting, their best performance being sadly not good enough.South Australia won by 15 runs.


The Stats Team 624
179 NatWest Series, ENG v PAK, 5th ODI, Match Report

5th ODI: England v Pakistan (Winner: ENG)

ENG 256/6 (E Morgan 107*, P Collingwood 47, S Akhtar 3/40) beat PAK 135 (K Akmal 41, G Swann 3/26, S Broad 3/25) by 121 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: E Morgan The Rose Bowl, Southampton (22 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

At 2-2 the series was evenly poised with both Eng and Pak having same CWO of 50%. England decided to bat first but lost 2 quick wickets to be down to 46/2 in 10 overs with COW of 49%. More struggle was in store as Bell and Morgan steadied the innings to take them to 96/3 in 25 overs with a COW of 41%. However it was the 4 wicket partnership between Morgan and Collingwood that gave them a base as they reached 199/4 in 44 overs with a COW of 42%. Morgan proved his finishing capabilities as he notched up a century and England ended up with 255/6 and a COW of 44%. Pakistan got off to a good start and after 10 overs were 57/0 with a COW of 60%. But there after England chipped away with wickets at regular intervals as Pakistan reached 113/6 after 30 with a COW of 35%. There were no heroics this time as Broad and Swann picked up 3 each as Pakistan collapsed to 135 all out in 37 overs to lose the series 3-2.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (England)  
 
arrow 12 Overs: ENG 48/3 PAK 54% England start was not the greatest
      as they lost 3 opening wickets while scoring at a run-rate of 4.England’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: ENG 96/3 PAK 59% England continued to piddle around
      at the same run-rate while their batting struggled with migraines and injuries. England’s chances decreased by 5% during this period.
arrow 38 Overs: ENG 169/4 PAK 57% England got a good partnership
      between Morgan and a Collingwood on aspirin as they headed towards the Death Overs..England’s chances increased by 2% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: ENG 255/6 PAK 56% Morgan powered towards yet
      another ODI century, however the lack of support at the other end meant that England got fewer runs than they would have liked.England’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (Pakistan: Target 256)  
     
arrow 9 Overs: PAK 57/0 PAK 61% Pakistan powered towards the total
      with a belligerent opening partnership .Pakistan’s chances increased by 5% during this period.
arrow 20 Overs: PAK 83/4 ENG 53% Pakistan suffered a mini-collapse
      which lost them 4 wickets and put them behind the required rate.Pakistan’s chances decreased by 14% during this period.
arrow 28 Overs: PAK 104/6 ENG 65% Pakistan’s troubles continued as they
      were into the tail and the target was far away. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 3% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: PAK 135/10 ENG 100% Pakistan played without purpose
      during the final overs and went through their motions, finally finishing well short of the target.England won by 121 runs.


The Stats Team 684
180 NatWest Series, ENG v PAK, 4th ODI, Match Report

4th ODI: England v Pakistan (Winner: PAK)

PAK 265/7 (M Hafeez 64, A Razzaq 44*, G Swann 4/37, S Broad 2/44) beat ENG 227 (A Strauss 68, S Davies 49, U Gul 4/32, S Akhtar 3/59) by 38 runs.

   Match Scorecard  
Man of the Match: A Razzaq Lord's, London (20 Sep,2010)
cow-analysis

Having thoroughly outclassed England in the 3rd ODI, Pakistan were slight favourites for this one. Once again Pakistan got off to a slow but steady start and reached 62/1 in 14 overs with COW of 50%. Wickets fell at regular interval but Hafeez compiled a sedate half century. But no one could convert their starts in to useful contribution till Abdul Razzak plundered the attack in last 4 overs as Pakistan ended at 265/7 with a COW of 45%. England got off to a similar start and in fact their openers took them to 113 in 20 overs with COW of 43% as their run rate struggled. But there after wickets fell at regular intervals as English players struggled to keep the RRR in check and another inspired spell of bowling by Umar Gul proved to be the proverbial last straw and England collapsed to 227 all out to tie the series at 2-2.

 
cow-key
  First Inns (Pakistan)  
 
arrow 13 Overs: PAK 61/0 PAK 52% Pakistan started with a good
      opening partnership however it was a bit on the slow side.Pakistan’s chances increased by 1% during this period.
arrow 25 Overs: PAK 101/3 ENG 58% Pakistan’s run-rate dropped as Swann
      wreaked havoc grabbing 2 wickets .Pakistan’s chances decreased by 10% during this period.
arrow 37 Overs: PAK 155/4 ENG 65% Pakistan continued plodding along
      at a sub-par run-rate, they also lost a wicket to boot. Pakistan’s chances decreased by 7% during this period.
arrow 50 Overs: PAK 265/7 ENG 55% Wonderful cameos from Shahid
      Afridi and Abdul Razzaq got Pakistan to a decent total. Pakistan’s chances increased by 10% during this period.
       
  Second Inns (England: Target 266)  
     
arrow 10 Overs: ENG 73/0 ENG 62% England got off to a flier with
      the opening pair of Strauss and Davies dismantling the Pakistani bowling. England’s chances increased by 7% during this period.
arrow 19 Overs: ENG 107/0 ENG 58% The opening partnership crossed 100
      but there was a noticeable slackening of pace in the scoring. England’s chances decreased by 4% during this period.
arrow 34 Overs: ENG 162/4 PAK 55% Pakistan fought back in style taking
      4 wickets while keeping the runs in check, giving them the upper hand. England’s chances decreased by 13% during this period.
arrow 46.1 Overs: ENG 227/10 PAK 100% Umar Gul once again cleaned up
      the England tail as Pakistan surged to an incredible victory, that from all accounts is genuine.Pakistan won by 38 runs.


The Stats Team 644
 
<< Start < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>
Page 6 of 9
This Week's Poll:


Is the entire IPL fixed?
(6 votes)

33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Loading...