|
Blog Entry -
Blog
|
Sunday, 20 January 2008 09:57 |
|
Contributed by Sreeram Ramachandran
|
(3235 views) |
|
So let's make this very brief, since the general line of criticism and complaints here is going to be extremely similar to rants in the past such as the ones that followed when Dravid was dropped. Let us just dwell on the few points that are a little different and merit separate attention.
For the rest a link will be provided to a piece written when Dravid was excluded, since several of the arguments overlap.
Saurav Ganguly has scored 1240 runs in his last 12 months of test cricket, at an average of 44.28, with only four other players in International cricket doing better. Suresh Raina is not one of them, neither is Gautam Gambhir (no disrespect intended to the players mentioned).
The line 'building for the future' is one of the most abused, misused and misdirected statements in Indian cricket. If you want to build a company for the future you don't do it by asking the CEO to take a nice long walk, and getting a junior employee to fill his seat. You make the young promising turk an understudy to the CEO so he can replace him smoothly when the time comes. Rushing towards the 'future' and being blind to the present is a concept you have to wonder at. One gets the impression Matthew Hayden and the rest of his mid-30's mates from the Australian team would be glad they weren't Indian cricketers.
The other explanation being farmed around is they are trying to build a 'young fielding side'. Nice thought, but how about run-scoring? That is not the primary requirement then, apparently. Fielding is extremely important but good luck to you if you are going to place that over batting and bowling. It might be an interesting exercise to ask a cricket-literate Sri Lankan to consider replacing Arjuna Ranatunga in the 1990's Lankan side with someone with a 32 inch waist and watch his reaction.
Not looking to get on to Gambhir's case, but just to offer an illustration, Gambhir averages 35.22 in 2007, and while Ganguly is clearly someone you might try and hide on the field, he cannot possibly be too much worse than Gambhir, can he? Not so bad that it outweighs the extra value Ganguly adds with the bat.
Ahh, we are already beginning to run into rather obvious arguments that should be visible to anyone, especially the selectors. There really is little more to say that hasn't been said before, so here is the Dravid-omission article as promised....
An interesting argument was raised earlier on this website about how relevant, or irrelevant, this whole debate about experience and youth is. With the recent turn of events, this debate has suddenly become relevant, so here is the article
!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 November 2011 14:56 |
Must say you are right. But the crassness of it all is astounding. The BCCI could have at least asked Kumble who anyway has retired from ODIs by his own volition, to talk to the seniors and perhaps the five of them could have addressed the media together in order to make the team more united, the youngsters to respect them more and the media to have no grist to its mill. Kumble could have swung it, considering the manner in which he has handled what (needlessly) became an international cause diplomatique. Of course, Rahul and Sourav have the steel in them to make a statement with their bats at Adelaide, and so does Lakshman. But one despairs. Why can't, oh, why can't the BCCI be more professional, civilised and caring? Even Pakistan has begun to look after its cricketers with greater care. Look at the way in which they have handled the injury of Mohammed Asif. Or for that matter, the way in which the Sri Lankan board handles succession. What the BCCI needs urgently is a child psychologist to counsel the BCCI how to handle young persons.
Agree with you that the test is all. The one-day series is for the ignoscenti. Hope the teams bands together and wins, for test cricket's sake. If they do, this series will be spoken of in the same breath as the tied test series of 60-61.