IPL Song | IPL 6 Schedule/Results | Points Table | PWI v DD: Scorecard | SRH v KKR: Scorecard
Tendulkar To Open In Tests
Blog Entry - Blog Wednesday, 12 December 2007 06:42
Contributed by Jaideep Varma    (2426 views)

On evidence of the last few months, Yuvraj is probably India’s most effective batsman, and if we leave reputation and past baggage out of the picture, on sheer potential, his name should be penciled in first after the captain’s in the team. That makes things tricky when Tendulkar returns to the team. It is impossible to accommodate Dravid, Tendulkar, Ganguly, Laxman, Yuvraj – all in the middle order (especially with Dhoni and maybe Pathan to follow).

The most obvious option (that has already begun making rounds) is that Dravid should be pushed up to open with Wasim Jaffer, with Laxman at no. 3. As usual, let Dravid bear the brunt of having the ability to face the new ball. As an opener, Laxman averages 29 in 25 innings, and Yuvraj averages 15 in 2 innings. Ganguly, with his weakness against the short ball, is not a candidate.

Dravid can cope. Well, he averages 34 in 13 innings in that position, whereas his average at no. 3 is 58 in 144 innings.

The obvious choice for no. 3 then becomes VVS Laxman, who averages 48 in 27 innings in that position. (At no. 5, he averages 45 in 24 innings, and at no. 6, his average is 48 in 52 innings.) However, Laxman’s away average at no. 3 drops to 34. He has publicly, and very emphatically stated that he does not like opening at all. And given his current form and state in the team, where he is playing for his place most of the time, is he in the right frame of mind to shoulder that crucial responsibility?

The most important factor to remember is that Dravid has repeatedly indicated that he prefers the no. 3 position to an opening slot, so clearly he would be doing something he is not entirely comfortable with. Given that he is India’s most important batsman overseas, and is not exactly in the best of form, it does not at all seem like a wise move for the team, as there would be two batsmen – Dravid, and whoever takes his place at the equally important no.3 position -  adjusting to accommodate Yuvraj’s inclusion.

Meanwhile, what about the only other cricketer in this team, who is equipped with the technical wherewithal to open for India – Sachin Tendulkar? It is ridiculous enough that he has opened just once in test cricket (in 2000 vs NZ in Ahmedabad) scoring 15. His ODI opening average is 48 with a stunning 37 hundreds. Why has India’s most talented batsman never ever taken on the challenge of adopting the most difficult batting position?

When you consider India’s batting line-up, it is clear that the team can actually do without Tendulkar in the middle-order. They need his talent up the order, and leave the only other player capable of adjusting as an opener, Dravid, at the crucial no. 3 position, from where he has become India’s most valuable batsman bar none. 

India has the opportunity to make history in Australia this time around – they have just the right team for it, if this opening slot can be filled with a reliable incumbent. And there is no-one more suitable than Tendulkar here.

But who will bell the cat? Or more pertinently – who will tackle the holy cow?
 
 
Postscript 
 
With the selection of the Indian test team for Australia, things are now even more complex. Sehwag's surprise inclusion has complicated things even more. It is actually a very good decision, rewarding an outstanding talent with the benefit of doubt only 'legends' get, which Sehwag never was (surprising, given his magnificent past test performances). Yes, he is out of form, yes, he has shown an obstinate lack of mental adjustability lately (repeatedly getting out to bad shots) but it is still worth this punt on a tour as difficult as Australia, with the prize being greater than anything in contemporary cricket.
 
A series victory in Australia would be greater than any world cup win, and easily India's greatest cricketing achievement ever. Sehwag's stand-and-deliver style will actually work better on Australian pitches better than at home, and given that it could be his last chance to make amends, it will be interesting to see how he responds.
 
Still, it is unlikely he will play in the first two tests (unless he is in awesome form in the tour games; in which case the casualty could be Yuvraj) and that means Dravid will probably be asked to open. The ironic situation then is – if Dravid fails in the first two tests, it could be his place that would be under threat. And India's most important overseas batsman wouldn't even have batted at the position he is most comfortable with, in his team's most important tour.

Embarrassment of riches can sometimes be a very bad thing. Especially in a holy cow culture.

  


  • Shivaswamy  - Dravid - Not to open in the Te
    Dravid, the great batsman and the unassuming team man is made a mere scape goat for the indifferent form and the way India played in the first test. Moreover it is surprising that no one even comes to his defence when he is not in the best of forms. It is important to recall that the great Sachin was not in form for almost 2 years and the selectors still kept him in the playing 11. It will be unfair to drop Dravid after merely a series without much scores. It is a matter of time before he regroups and comes back to doing his best - scoring runs.
  • Ranesh
    Now that Dravid has been made the scapegoat, are those who forced him to cover up for the other so-called great stars happy? Poor, out of form Dravid had to fight the demons in his own mind as well as the demons in the form of Brett Lee and Mitchell Johnson. At least he fought only as he can. But even as he grafted in order to protect those following him, many of the failures of Indian cricket masquerading as experts are demanding his head. How despicable can one get? And what did the so-called greatest talent since Sachin, yuvraj did? The proof of international batting is doing it in Australia. Yuvraj, whose head is more swollen than a leg with elephantiasis, showed that he does not have the temperament to stand up to a champion team. Nor does he have the grit and selflessness to fight for his team. One wonders what so many people have against Dravid. He is not even allowed to bat at No.3 which is his spot by right in any world XI. Why is he treated like a yo-yo? Dravid has nothing to prove. But he still proved something - that he is the only indian batsman of all time who can fearlessly and more importantly, selflessly, play at any position from 1 to 11. Can any other batsman claim that?
  • suman  - stat proves dravid still the b
    Rahul Dravid has aggregated 606 runs in 19 innings (10 Tests) at an average of 35.64, including one century and three fifties, in 2007 –

    Tendulkar’s average in 2003 was around 17 and 2004 it was 23 but he never dropped from team for bad performance Ganguly was non performing captain for almost more than 2 yrs nobody asked his sacking
    Now the ppl are screaming against dravid even though he secricfied his batting position and his average still good,
    Even dhoni yuvraj jaffer harbjan failed
    Superstars also faile Even chela harbajan was wktless in 6 matches but he played full odi series against aussiees and apkistan
    no senior player dropped just after five bad innigns.
    the player who performed for team gave selfless service to team for so many yrs consistantly will never get such long chances
    ***** cricketers turn experts like jadeja, sabakarim, arunlal, yashpal sharma,nikil chopara are doing dravid bashing from last 2 yrs are screaming now for his head
    biased media..both superstars also failed but nobody has guts speak againt their failure.d But ruled does not apply to superstars..
  • suman  - slet tendulkar and ganguly ope
    even master blaster did not blast or tiger did not roar. Coming in middle order facing old ball and made some runs so that nobody will point finger towards them

    what about failure of jaffer, laxman dhoni yuvraj and harbajan wktless????
    no other Indian batsman is ready to open, cos they all are under tremendous pressure even playing in their regular slot, but.. at least dravid stayed and played otherwise we would have gone below 100 runs As a professional team player dravid he accepted challenge knowing that chief selector has already an against him and dravid face new balls stayed almost 2 hours otherwise team would have got even 100 runs
    Dravid is still best...Ganguly said he missed many 100s bcuz of batting up in order why he did not come forward to opening??why great tendulkar did not secirfice his position while he wanted to open in odis. tmaster blaster did not blast or tiger did not roar..where was superstars when team require their service blabbering so much in front of media
    Dravid is the savior not only for Indian cricket and to other Indian batsmen too
  • sadananda g patki  - sachin should be asked to open
    I think Sachin , being regarded as the best batsman ever, should be asked by the management to open for India. i feel after being dropped from one day cricket Dravid is not feeling very comfortable in tests also, he should be allowed to bat at no 3 for sometime till gets his form back.
  • adhithya  - sachin should open
    I think Schin should open with Shwag in first tet Down Under.Shwag is an attacking opener and Schin has always done well against the 'Mighty Aussies'.If that happes, Yuvi is out and Krthik comes in as a specilist batsman.I think if Schin & Shwag click it will be a horrid time for australia.if they don't , Tendulkar goes back to No:4 and Dravid comes up the opening.
  • Sreeram
    There are two facts known

    - The best way to beat Australia is with aggression, and with attacking cricket
    - Australia's general modus operandi at home is to get the opposition down and put them under siege...

    Given that, I feel it would be an interesting gamble to play Yuvraj as an opener (if and ONLY if he is confident). Yuvraj is the most attacking opening option we have, he is comfortable against pace (while there is an element of movement involved, Australia is more about pace and bounce than swing unlike, say, England and New Zealand). And most importantly, he is one of the strongest options India have to break sieges and change the run of play altogether.

    If he clicks, Australia will be left facing their own treatment of aggressive, attacking cricket right from the top, which they have been vulnerable to in the past. If he doesnt, well, we lose a valuable middle order player. The risk involved brings us to my second option.

    Irfan Pathan is a decent bat. If he doesnt have qualms about opening, it would be interesting to send him up at the top. If he clicks, great opening start with the 7 key batsmen intact. If he doesnt, well, Dravid comes in to settle things down, performing the functions he would as an opener and with the mental comfort of being at number 3.

    As for Tendulkar, while it is a great option on paper, I think we might be overestimating him a bit. Unless he really wants to open he won't do well. That is a shortcoming on his part, but one that India will need to work around rather than try and aggravate.
  • Jatin  - Afterall do we have realistic
    With only options of Jaffer and Sehwag along with the not-yet-settled-for-the-position-of-opener Karthik for opening down under, we are left with no option but to put any of the middle order batsmen to play as an opener (it is very clear that two specialist openers cannot be accomodated). The question now is who will be ready to face the challenge?

    Dravid is more used to facing such challenges, more because of the pressure from the management. But he SHOULDN'T.

    Tendulkar is ideal for the position but management wont risk him. when will they understand that now there's nothing to lose with risking him, specially when both Ganguly and Laxman are in great form. But THEY WONT

    Ganguly, well, is OUT OF THE QUESTION.

    Yuvi is a good option. But then it's a gamble with his great form and will really test him out. Outcome: HE CAN

    Pathan can come out as opener (and mind you he is as good a batsman as any in the team right now). Outcome: even if he gets out *****, Dravid will come at no. 3 which will again serve as good as him being an opener. BUT IT WILL LEAVE DRAVID SATISFIED THAT HE IS NOT OPENING. NOT BAD AT ALL

    Sehwag has a very bleak chance of making it to the final 11, lets face it. He can only make it if Jaffer gets out of form, but in that case Karthik will stand out as a better option. So he is NOT possible. Unless someone gets injured...

    Karthik should be really happy that he made it to Australia and he will surely learn a lot from the tour. But playing in the starting 11 is only possible for him if Jaffer or Dhoni get injured. NOT LIKELY.

    so here is my say:
    it will be Dravid and Jaffer
    it can be Jaffer and Pathan but
    it wont be Jaffer and Tendulkar...

    and it should be Tendulkar and any of the remaining three:
    Jaffer
    Sehwag
    Karthik

    Doesn't that give Team India much better options??
  • Vistasp  - just to add:
    DRAVID DROPPED AFTER AN INDIFFERENT AUSSIE TOUR!

    This is the headline I am referring to. My post does not make sense without it.
  • holdingwilley  - Worthwhile gamble regardless
    Yes, Dravid's place will be under scrutiny given his indifferent two tours in SA and England. All the more reason to let him bat at the position he has had he tmost success from.
    Why is it a given that Tendulkar won't succeed? He has the technique, the experience, the sheer natural ability to make a great fist of it. Most importantly, it makes the team far stronger overall. Yuvraj is certainly not the flavour of the month - the guy's been around for 7 years. He's just playing near his peak right now, and after Tendulkar he is easily the finest natural talent India has produced. By asking him to open would be unfair as the guy does not even open for his state! And dropping him to accommodate a specialist opener just seems a mistake too.
    Why not just try Tendulkar in the first test as an opener? If he fails, let him go back to 4 after that. But if he succeeds, what a tremendous boost it will be to this team. Surely, that itself is a gamble worth taking. You have to think like that if you're to beat Australia.
    If the openers fail, nothing Tendulkar can do at no. 4 will save the situation for India. Remember the 2000 Aus tour?

    Jaideep
  • Vistasp  - Dravid dropped after an indiff
    With Dravid batting the way he is, (constantly looking over the shoulder, trying to prove his point desperately like he is playing in his first year and constantly looking lost on the field) my worry is that the above headline is just around the corner after the series down under.

    The new supposedly "resurgent" India has no time to understand subtleties of form, temperament, class or track record. The headline above is not in any way to undermine Dravid's unquestioned class but more to take into account the fact that by forcing him to become an opener, we may well end up making him a scapegoat to accomodate India's current middle-order "flavours" and that to my mind will go down as a terrible, terrible modern day tragedy of Indian cricket. Not only that, it may even end up depriving us of his real worth for the Aussie tour.

    It's not for me to say if Sachin should volunteer or not, but I agree with Jaideep when he says that if the selecteors don't expect this of Sachin, why must Dravid with all his ability, not be accorded the same respect and decency? Especially on an overseas tour where his track as a one down bat should not even be up for scrutiny.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 November 2011 16:52
 
About the author
Articles:
Reads:
Avg. Reads: 0
FB Likes:
Tweets:
...
View Full Profile
Related Content
This Week's Poll:


Which is the easiest team to beat in this year's IPL?
(743 votes)

28.1%
33%
13.3%
25.6%
Loading...