|
Written by Jonathan
|
|
Friday, 29 December 2006 |
|
Australia vs England 4th Ashes Test
What
a difference a year makes. Apparently still drunk with all that bubbly
and sorely lacking the on-the-field focus that Michael Vaughan was so committed
to, a haplessly underprepared English squad have proceeded to melt in the heat
of Australia's 'winter' leaving the urn next to the now-spreading puddle where
they once stood.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jaideep
|
|
Monday, 18 December 2006 |
|
Australia
vs England 3rd
Ashes Test
India vs South Africa
So, Australia
comprehensively won back the Ashes and showed why the 2005 loss was a blip. And
India, after a harrowing ODI series in South Africa, suddenly found their “Big
5” together again (Dravid, Tendulkar, Laxman, Sehwag and Ganguly), and more
importantly a bowling attack that made South Africa hop in their own backyard –
all of which lead to an astonishing first-ever test win on South African soil.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jaideep
|
|
Saturday, 16 December 2006 |
|
India vs South Africa 1st Test
Australia vs England 3rd Test
New Zealand vs Sri Lanka 2nd Test
Two unbelievable performances in test matches
in Australia and South Africa,
with vastly varying results for the home teams. Australia,
very overwhelmingly came close to winning the Ashes back as it pulverized an
unimaginative England
– with Gilchrist retaining his touch and blasting the second-fastest century of
all time. And India, wonder
of wonders, produced its greatest medium pace/ swing bowling performance
abroad, as it blew away a dazed South
Africa for 84. Both matches exemplified the
irresistible drama of test cricket at its best.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jaideep
|
|
Friday, 15 December 2006 |
|
I couldn’t agree more with Sanjay about the electronic
eye aiding the umpire. There are too many bizarre arguments thrown up by
traditionalists (and other kinds of people too) which quite simply don’t take
the betterment of the game into account. One such reasoning is that part of the
game’s charm is this variable of human error from the umpire. This is
ridiculous, as it does not take into account the players’ careers that could be
on the line, or the match that could be at a razor’s edge (like Strauss’ wicket
today). It really is time to let scientific progress lead to attitudinal
progress here.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Sanjay
|
|
Friday, 15 December 2006 |
|
Today’s Indian batting performance was a sure
indicator of why Sehwag should be dropped over Tendulkar. Sehwag once again
could barely survive whereas Tendulkar topscored with a battling performance
and was out to a superb delivery from Kallis. Sehwag needs some time without
the pressure of opening to work out the kinks in his game. I am not suggesting
that he be dropped for an extended period of time, but just enough to sort his
head out.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jaideep
|
|
Thursday, 14 December 2006 |
|
Ashes 3rd Test, 1st Day: Australia 244 all out; England 52-2
One of the great clichés in India is that Sikhs are more about brawn than brain. That there are hardly any sardar intellectuals, nor is there much of an intellectual culture amongst the majority of them adds to the jibe. Though partly true, like all clichés, its disproving (and exceptions) is quite spectacular, and nowhere is it better achieved than in cricket. More precisely, when it comes to spinners.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Jaideep
|
|
Thursday, 14 December 2006 |
|
Responding
to Sanjay’s comments. Sehwag, despite his poor form off and on, has been so
much of a comprehensive match-winner in the last few years, that he probably
deserves a longer rope than Tendulkar. And Sehwag’s career has always been like
this – he fails probably 8 times, succeeds 3 or 4 times, but those successes
are so spectacular and so critical to India’s progress, that they justify
his inclusion. Moreover, interestingly, his average usually doesn’t drop by
much in those lean periods. In the last 6 test matches, which have generally
constituted one of his leanest trots, he averages about 42, which is by no
means poor.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Sanjay
|
|
Wednesday, 13 December 2006 |
|
I agree with Jaideep. On current form Irfan
Pathan should be included in the team as a batsman-bowler, not the other way
around. It opens up the options tremendously for picking bowlers. Zaheer Khan
and VRV Singh are shoo-ins based on their performances and Sreesanth, despite
his waywardness will come around.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 11 12 Next > End >>
|
| Results 131 - 143 of 147 |